Life in a Metro:
Aniket, working with an IT company, now on suspension, on a lovely resort takes the initiative to delete the messages in his inbox. On the process, every story connected with the messages flashes before his eyes and it gets shown to us. His fling with Lilette and his divorce; his friend’s plight and his wife’s desperate attempts to earn money; another friend and his ‘partner’s’ decision of aborting their child; Aniket’s company’s sudden decision of layoff; stakes in shares; so on and so forth are the building blocks of the film. A man, in a city, running after lucre and love returns back to a broken family. He may have money, but no solace; may have a house, but no proper place; may have a father, but not his closeness; may have a lover, but short-lived; may have an excellent job profile, but a hollow and uncertain future. The portion of the film that explores office politics and the trauma and travails of being a private-office worker bears resemblance with Satyajit Ray’s ‘Seemabaddha’. The city of Joy, Kolkata, only torments. Urban fallacies are at play at every nook and cranny of the city. Their veneer may entice, only to climb on you like a Poison Ivy and strangle like a Boa constrictor. Every lurking grain for sadness and gloom appear as a sweet seed of a glorious and top-drawer future position.
The light and it’s interplay with the respective emotional scenes are, more or less, acceptable. The music is also, mostly, along the proper lines. There are a few characters that appear without exactness and bloom. This, then, is life which is not supposed to, always, please and be perfect. Even initial right moves in life’s important moments may appear a wrong step in the end. Such is life: a butterfly of attractive colours and patterns, but it’s uncertain on which leaf or which bough or on whose hand or dress it will rest.
It is Mental Ditty!:
Yet once again, Aparna Sen’s ‘Iti ‘Mrinalini’: An Unfinished Letter…’ has created poetry on screen. Though some criticisms – by the famous ‘The Hollywood Reporter’ and the like – have wrongly assessed the film without even minutely watching it, yet a wrong critique cannot, in any way, mar the film’s extensive appeal to the true movie buffs and cineastes. The film has been wrongly called ‘melodramatic’ and even some self-proclaimed critics have blunderingly named some characters. After all this is not expected in relation to such films as of Sen’s.
Now, leaving behind my correctional and cautionary discussion above directed to some self-proclaimed film critics, I shall come down to the real and unbiased critique of the film. After having watched Sen’s quite a few films with rapt attention one can easily find a familiar colour and superficial calmness pitted against an inner turmoil in the film. The characters think and move just as we do – naturally. There is even no over-emphasis on unnatural music and unnatural gestures. The backdrop of each character in every emotional condition seems to complement the unknown and known thoughts of the viewer finding himself/herself easily identifiable with the characters at several moments in life. Instances of Pathetic Fallacy abound in the film, though with artistic restraint so that some even go unheeded. The best moment of love in most films taken together is the scene where Chintan Nair (Kaushik Sen) and young Mrinalini Mitra (Konkona Sen Sharma) discuss the aspects of love that frees oneself and is without expectations. The meteoric rise of an actress and her gradual, but desperate, search for satisfying love in the actually lonely and mercenary world of glamour are what the film shows in a glaring light, though various other themes overrun the film’s expanse. References to Shakti Chattopadhyay’s, Vladimir Mayakovsky’s and W.B. Yeats’s poems can be found. Passing references to François Truffaut, Ingmar Bergman and Jean-Luc Godard are also there. Art direction, as in Sen’s other films, has been very well carried out. Only one song – sung by the younger Mrinalini at a party – seemed incongruous in the whole movie, coupled with some minor anachronisms.
A letter – a suicide note bearing exculpatory indication on the part of others with whom Mrinalini was, has been and is linked – being written along the entire film gives the older Mrinalni flashbacks by dint of which the whole story gets told and seen. But, ironically the letter remains unfinished and finally discarded by Mrinalini when touched by a ray of hope form Chintan’s message. Yet, the first rays of the morning sun has something in it’s store. She dies a silent death. And the way the camera moves vertically up keeping the focus on her dead body bears parallels with a scene in ‘Inglourious Basterds’ where the twin murder takes place inside the room from where a film is projected on screen. To sum up, Sen’s movie is a product of curious toil and astute storytelling that is characteristic of all her films. And lastly, one must watch the film observingly before commenting pedantically on it for just the sake of commenting.
In Search of Rhymes in a Blank-versed Life:
“Some are born great, some achieve greatness, and others have greatness thrust upon ’em,” William Shakespeare once said. We find the second category in work in this movie. But, we also find, if noted carefully, the other two categories having passing references at several points of the film. Caught in this mesh of the warp and woof of various threads of ‘greatness’ is a man, a putative ‘Hero’, searching for rhymes in a life riddled with blank verse. Shuttling between illusion and reality, he finds some rhyming notes, as it were, in Aditi – a journalist – who at first disregards him for she thinks actors are over-worshipped and unreal. Being in such a high position he has none to confide in as doing that may play havoc with his films and fan-base. Timely flashbacks, which concrete the base of his character and adds to the film a surreal tinge, tell upon his persona as a ‘Hero’ and he hits the bottle. An often-worshipped and ever-lauded ‘Hero’ becomes a flesh-and-blood layman to be cared for and sympathised with. Though the train journey has brought the ‘Hero’ close to a small part of his ‘public’, yet the journey has its end; and with it ends the contact with reality, ends the friend to be confided in, ends the haunting retrospection. What lies ahead is a sea of fans at the gate with their unquestioning acceptance of and devotion to their unreal ‘Hero’ and for him again a life of illusion and hero-worship. Parallelly moving with this main plot are some subtly woven sub-plots which show the idiosyncrasies of the characters on board the train along with the ‘Hero.’ The characters contained in the microcosm of life, reflective of the macrocosm, on the train act as Ray’s mouthpieces to drive home some wrongly-held notions, regarding life and films, by the ‘public’ and the ‘Hero.’
Lyricism in Love:
The malleability of the plausible emotions of the lead characters of the film under the director’s realistic hammer blows is one of the features which makes ‘The Japanese Wife’ a treat to watch. The slow pace touches upon the various chords of a sensible heart. The two star-crossed spouses residing in far-off places fall in love and eventually marry without actually meeting each other in person, yet their love is far more loyal and inextricable than those lovers or spouses who stay together. But, their simple lifestyle and righteousness do them in at last. Poetic justice is not meted out and this makes the plot all the more plausible. Given the profound dynamism and the many facets of human emotions that run crisscross along the length & breadth of the movie, one is sure to identify with the pristine humanity of the characters. Minimalism in music and natural, yet far from being a dime a dozen, musically lyrical words and sentences coupled with a haunting silence of death touch up the aggravating pathos of the characters till the very end.
Straightforward Narration of So-called Aberration:
The very inception of the film gives a feeling of it being ghost- directed by Rituparno Ghosh. But, the germs of it being the first film of a director under Rituparno’s tutelage can be made out after one has gone through a considerable portion of the film. Excepting these discussions, what we glean from movie is a so-called aberrant sexuality which, it says, is not to be looked down upon by the fortunate heterosexuals of this world. Arati (Deepti Naval) – the mother, finding it hard to come to terms with and to switch her emotions between her son’s sudden death and his homosexuality hitherto unknown to her – at first detests Ornub (Rituparno), but subsequently starts cherishing his company taking him to be her dead son’s ‘special’ someone or her another alive son. Another relation, between Sahana (Raima Sen) and Arati, is also a very pleasant one founded on honesty and respect. Arati, during her short stay at her dead son’s house, learns about certain grim truths about this world which, heretofore even her grey hair has not shown her. When she leaves, she leaves with a bagful of warm closeness she has unknowingly amassed within these few days from both Ornub and Sahana and leaves behind with them ‘a bit of’ herself and her dead son. The background melody and the nominal songs accentuate the situations. To draw the conclusion we can say that ‘Memories in March’ is a good attempt at narration, though with a profusion of Rituparnovian touches.
Equality (White) Arrived at:
Having not yet watched the other two of the Colours Trilogy, I have set down to comment on the middle one as I can’t let my agitated heart-rate settle down in any other way. Needless to say, ‘white’ denotes one colour, of the flag of France, that stands for equality; and this equality is arrived at in the end between Karol & Domininque by the most promising scene of the film where she makes certain intriguing movements of hands indicating her acceptance of his wedding ring. The first hint of doves making Karol’s shirt dirty before he enters the court to be mentally decimated my his wife’s remarks is the miry & dirty ground whereupon the reconstruction of their broken relation starts & which turns clean, or white, in the end. Those scenes which show how Karol stages his own death to get back his life, i.e. his wife, bear the mark of the creative hammer of Krzysztof Kieslowski; the hot anvil of his always-excellent lighting arrangement & camera-work also delineates the gusto of the Polish procreator of films; the never-before soothing music, too, seems to come from a far away place. In a nutshell, ‘Three Colors: White’ is a panorama of earthly images, though with some minor defects, providing corneal & aural bliss.